[ad_1]
Former Trump White Home lawyer Stefan Passantino sued crooked prosecutor Andrew Weissmann for defamation over a tweet claiming that Passantino “coached” January 6 witness Cassidy Hutchinson to lie below oath.
The lawsuit was filed in a federal court docket in DC. Passantino is looking for damages in extra of $75,000.
Recall that Cassidy Hutchinson falsely testified Trump lunged at a Secret Service Agent on January 6.
Cassidy Hutchinson mentioned Trump acquired into “the beast” after his speech on the Ellipse on January 6 with the assumption that he could be pushed to the Capitol.
In response to Hutchinson, who obtained this data from Tony Ornato, the Assistant Director for the Secret Service, Trump grew indignant after he was knowledgeable that he was being pushed again to the West Wing.
In response to Ornato, Trump shouted, “I’m the f*cking president! Take me as much as the Capitol now!”
Hutchinson alleged that at this level Trump reached as much as the driving force, grabbed the steering wheel, and tried to commandeer the presidential limo.
Cassidy Hutchinson testified that her lawyer, Passantino, advised her previous to her testimony earlier than the January 6 Committee: “The much less you keep in mind, the higher.”
Nonetheless, Hutchinson advised the January 6 Committee throughout testimony that Stefan Passantino by no means advised her to lie.
“I simply wish to be sure that I make it clear that he didn’t say, ‘I would like you to lie and say that you simply don’t recall on this stuff after I know you recall,’” Hutchinson mentioned. “He didn’t inform me to lie. He advised me to not lie.”
On September 15, Weissmann claimed in a tweet that Hutchinson’s lawyer coached her to lie (he didn’t point out Passantino’s title).
Hunt is also Cassidy Hutchinson’s good lawyer. (Not the one who coached her to lie) And he’s the man who took notes of Trump saying, when Mueller was appointed, quoting him as saying “I’m f….d” https://t.co/HFGmwI9f0B
— Andrew Weissmann (weissmann11 on Threads) (@AWeissmann_) September 15, 2023
In accordance Regulation & Crime, the lawsuit states:
Defendant knew this to be false, or mentioned it with reckless disregard for its falsity, as a result of the transcripts of testimony confirmed that Mr. Passantino had performed nothing to impede or form Ms. Hutchinson’s testimony and certainly confirmed the other as she acknowledged that “Stefan by no means advised me to lie” and that “he advised me to not lie.”
Defendant selected to smear Mr. Passantino due to partisan animus and Mr. Passantino’s prior affiliation with President Trump. Moreover, Defendant attacked Mr. Passantino as a method of distracting from and rehabilitating the contradictory and uncredible facets of Ms. Hutchinson’s testimony, as they undermine the Choose Committee and its partisan findings and function.
Defendant’s smear has deeply broken Mr. Passantino’s 30-year status and had brought on him to lose important enterprise and earnings. Mr. Passantino seeks to carry Defendant accountable for this vicious lie and the damages it has wrought.
[ad_2]
Source link
