Numerous matters coated together with Pleasure Reid, the Ontario election, white privilege, progressives operating for congress, and way more!
source
Tags: cambodia hot newscambodia newscambodia news 2021cambodia news todayeconomy todayeconomy today newseconomy today usaelection 2023election 2024elections in usahun senhun sen newshun sen news todaykhmer hot newskhmer newskhmer news todaykhmer news2021khmer political newsLIVENewspoliticalpolitical analysispolitical news this weekpolitical news todayradio free asiaRationalrfa khmerrfa khmer liverfa khmer newsrfa khmer radiorfa khmer todayrfa radiorfi khmersam rainsysam rainsy todayvoa khmervoa khmer newsទូរទស្សន៍អាស៊ីសេរីព័ត៌មានព័ត៌មានថ្មីៗព័ត៌មានអាស៊ីសេរីវិទ្យុអាស៊ីសេរីហ៊ុនសែនអាស៊ីសេរី
The idiotic idiot.
Would love to know your response to this Open-Letter video to you Mr. Doel
I think it will be a very fruitful thing to see an open debate between you and 1791L
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymri3825XEY
Just tuned in to see what a fluff girl for buttsore Black men looks like. Now I've seen you. Bye-bye.
That’s hilarious. So you will only debate people you agree with? That’s not a debate, that’s an echo chamber.
P.S. white privilege doesn’t exist. Which is why you can only say that you have all these facts but you don’t present them. You don’t have facts, you have feminist books that spout nonsense to anyone who knows about history.
You are the definition of close minded and bigoted. You are a racist, ignorant, toxic human.
HAHAHHAHA david you are so fucking dumb
Look at that Like/Dislike ratio…
'I cant debate morality." This is guy is an atheist. If you have no God then morality becomes subjective.
If you cant distinguish between assessment (there is/is not white privelege) and morality then you are either very stupid or very dishonest.
You can find examples of privilege in every race.
How rational can you be when you think the purpose of a public youtube debate between 2 channels is to change the other youtuber's mind, rather than the thousands who will watch? Grow up dude
Your moral compass points so perfectly true north that you will only debate people if they already agree with you. That's the same bullshit argument that conservative right-wing evangelicals used to utilize. You have quite the infallibility complex.
So, in response to 1791L, you literally declared a refusal to "debate", against anyone who doesn't already agree with your presuppositions. That leads to one very important question.
Do you even know the definition of the word "debate"?
Hey just in case you didn't realize it you forgot the "ir" when you created your name, so you might want to fix it.
Your rational on "white privilidge" is utterly unconvincing.
"Doelling Kruger effect". LMAO!
What’s the point of having a debate with someone who believes the same bullshit you believe?
This guy is fucking laughable
"if you dont agree with me i wont debate with you" doel
David you have a echo in Your live stream