[ad_1]
Within the current prison prosecutions of Donald Trump and Hunter Biden, prosecutors and others emphasised that “nobody is above the regulation.”
Actually? Nobody?
How about retired Lt. Gen. James R. Clapper, Jr.? When he was serving because the Director of Nationwide Intelligence, he bought caught mendacity below oath to Congress after he falsely denied that “the NSA was gathering information on hundreds of thousands or a whole bunch of hundreds of thousands of People.”
Think about Clapper’s shock when Edward Snowden revealed the proof establishing that Clapper had lied. Do you see why the U.S. national-security institution hates Snowden a lot and would like to get their arms on him?
So, was Clapper ever indicted, prosecuted, and convicted, like Trump and Biden? Are you kidding? Clapper was a part of the U.S. national-security institution. Nobody goes after these individuals for prison offenses.
Contemplate the Pentagon’s and CIA’s decades-long torture regime at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Torture is prohibited. What number of excessive U.S. officers have been indicted for committing the crime of torture at Guantanamo Bay or elsewhere as a part of the much-vaunted “warfare on terrorism”? None!
In 2020, U.S. national-security state officers assassinated Iranian Gen. Qasem Soleimani. That was nothing greater than straight-out homicide, no totally different in precept than the Saudi regime’s homicide of columnist Jamal Khashoggi. Was any U.S. national-security state official charged with homicide? Don’t make me snort.
In fact, none of that is any information. Ever because the U.S. authorities was transformed to a national-security state, Pentagon, CIA, and NSA officers have violated prison legal guidelines with impunity.
In 1970, for instance, U.S. officers in Washington, D.C., and Virginia conspired to have Chilean thugs violently kidnap Gen. Rene Schneider, the general commander of the Chilean armed forces. Why did they enter into that unlawful conspiracy? As a result of Schneider was standing in the way in which of an unlawful navy coup in Chile that U.S. officers had been attempting to instigate.
When the kidnapping try passed off, Schneider, who was armed, fought again. The abductors shot him useless on the streets of Santiago. Underneath the felony-murder rule, that made the U.S. conspirators right here in america responsible of homicide.
Had been any of the conspirators ever indicted? In fact not. Homicide isn’t homicide when it’s dedicated by the U.S. national-security state. It’s thought-about to be defending “nationwide safety.”
Three years later, U.S. national-security state officers participated within the state-sponsored murders of two Americans, Charles Horman and Frank Teruggi, Jr. The murders passed off throughout the course of the Chilean coup in 1973, which U.S. officers had been lastly profitable in instigating.
Had been these U.S. officers who participated in these two murders of Americans ever indicted? Nope, at the very least not right here in america. One among them was indicted in Chile a few years later however by that point he had escaped justice by dying.
And naturally, there was the U.S. national-security state assassination of President Kennedy in 1963, together with the unlawful fraudulent post-mortem that was carried out on his physique as a part of the official cover-up. (See my e-book The Kennedy Post-mortem.) They bought away with homicide and unlawful tampering with a physique in that case too. However even when the malefactors had gotten indicted, there’s little doubt that the U.S. Supreme Courtroom would have allow them to off the hook on grounds of defending “nationwide safety,” the “political-question doctrine,” and certified immunity.
Nobody is above the regulation? That’s as a result of the national-security institution is the regulation.
Initially revealed at “Hornberger’s Weblog.”
[ad_2]
Source link
